How Long Can DCS Keep a Case Open? Federal Caps and the 15/22 Rule

A Department of Child Services case does not have one fixed expiration date. How long DCS can keep a case open depends on the phase the case is in and whether the child has been removed from the home. An investigation usually closes within 30 to 90 days. If the agency opens a formal case after that, federal law sets the outer edges: a permanency hearing within 12 months of a child entering foster care, and a requirement that the agency move to terminate parental rights once a child has spent 15 of the most recent 22 months in out-of-home care. In-home cases without a court removal can run longer, because no federal clock is ticking the same way.

How Long the Investigation Lasts

Every case begins with an investigation triggered by a report of possible abuse or neglect. A caseworker interviews the child, the parents, and others who know the family, and visits the home. Most states require the initial assessment to be completed within 30 to 90 days, though the exact deadline varies. Some states allow extensions for good cause, such as an unavailable witness or a family that cannot be located.

At the end of the investigation, the agency decides whether the allegations are unfounded or substantiated. Unfounded reports close the case. Substantiated reports move the family into one of two tracks: in-home services or out-of-home placement. The track determines almost everything about how long the case stays open next.

In-Home Cases Have No Federal Cap

When a report is substantiated but the child can safely remain at home, DCS opens an in-home services case and creates a written case plan. Federal law defines the case plan as a document describing how the agency will address the safety concerns, what services the family will receive, and what needs to change in the home.1GovInfo. 42 USC 675 – Definitions Typical goals include substance abuse treatment, parenting education, mental health counseling, or maintaining stable housing.

The agency reviews the case plan at least every six months. A straightforward situation might close in a few months. A case involving addiction, untreated mental illness, or domestic violence can stretch well past a year. There is no hard federal cap on in-home cases the way there is on out-of-home placements, so the case effectively stays open as long as the agency believes the child’s safety still requires monitoring.

Out-of-Home Cases Run on a Federal Clock

When the risk is too high to leave the child at home, DCS places the child in foster care, with a relative, or in another approved setting. That removal triggers the stricter timelines under the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which were written to keep children from drifting through temporary placements for years.

Permanency Hearing at 12 Months

Federal law requires a permanency hearing within 12 months of the child entering foster care, and every 12 months after that until the case closes. At the hearing, the court evaluates the agency’s long-term plan. Reunification is almost always the first goal, but the court also weighs whether reunification is realistic given the parents’ progress. If it is not, the court can change the goal to adoption, legal guardianship, or placement with a relative.

The 15-of-22-Month Rule

The most consequential deadline kicks in when a child has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months. At that point, federal law requires the agency to file a petition to terminate parental rights, unless a narrow exception applies.2U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Freeing Children for Adoption within the Adoption and Safe Families Act Timeline The agency may hold off if the child is placed with a relative, if it has documented a compelling reason why termination is not in the child’s best interest, or if the agency itself failed to provide services required by the case plan.

The 15/22 rule does not automatically end parental rights at the 15-month mark. It requires the agency to start the legal process. Termination proceedings themselves take additional months, and parents have a right to contest them. But this rule is the main reason out-of-home cases move faster than in-home ones. The federal clock is running, and the agency faces consequences for missing benchmarks.

When the Timeline Compresses

In the most serious cases, federal law lets courts skip reunification efforts entirely. Under 42 USC 671, a court can find that reasonable efforts toward reunification are not required when a parent has subjected the child to aggravated circumstances, which state laws typically define to include abandonment, torture, chronic abuse, or sexual abuse. The same bypass applies when a parent has been convicted of murdering or committing voluntary manslaughter against another child, committed a felony assault causing serious bodily injury to a child, or has already had parental rights to a sibling involuntarily terminated.3Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 42 USC 671 – State Plan for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance

When a court makes that finding, the permanency hearing must happen within 30 days rather than 12 months, and the agency shifts immediately to finding a permanent alternative like adoption or guardianship.3Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 42 USC 671 – State Plan for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance These are the fastest cases in the system.

The timeline can also extend past age 18. Some states allow foster care to continue until age 21 under the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, so a case for an older youth who opts into extended support can remain open for years.1GovInfo. 42 USC 675 – Definitions

What Actually Pushes a Case Longer or Shorter

Within these legal windows, a handful of practical factors decide where a specific case lands.

  • Parental engagement. This is the single biggest variable. Parents who start services quickly and attend consistently give the agency and court reason to move toward closure. Delayed or sporadic participation stretches the case and, in an out-of-home situation, brings the 15/22-month deadline closer.
  • Complexity of the underlying issues. A single incident of inadequate supervision resolves far faster than long-term addiction, untreated mental illness, or domestic violence. Multiple overlapping issues mean multiple services, each with its own timeline.
  • Availability of services. Waitlists for substance abuse treatment, mental health providers, or affordable housing can stall a case even when the parents are motivated. Rural areas are especially prone to service gaps.
  • Court scheduling. Dependency courts carry heavy dockets in many jurisdictions, and hearings can slip by weeks or months for reasons that have nothing to do with the family.
  • Interstate complications. When a parent lives in a different state from the child, placements must go through the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, which adds its own review process.
  • Non-compliance. Ignoring the case plan does not make DCS go away. Judges treat missed appointments, failed drug tests, and unmet requirements as evidence that the safety concerns remain, and the 15/22 clock does not pause while a parent decides whether to participate.

The Trial Home Visit Before Closure

When an out-of-home case is heading toward reunification, the child usually does not go straight from foster care back to the parent with the case closing the same day. Most jurisdictions use a trial home visit, sometimes called a trial reunification, where the child returns home while DCS continues to monitor the family. The case stays open throughout.

Trial home visits generally last three to six months. The caseworker conducts regular check-ins, and the court can extend the visit if more time is needed to confirm the home is stable. If safety concerns resurface, the agency can return the child to foster care without starting the removal process over. This is the last stretch before the case officially closes.

How the Case Officially Closes

Closure looks different depending on whether the court was involved. In court-involved cases, a judge issues an order terminating the court’s jurisdiction over the family, typically after the caseworker, the guardian ad litem, and the parties’ attorneys agree that the safety concerns have been resolved. In non-court cases, the agency makes an administrative decision to close once the parents have completed the case plan.

Closure ends the agency’s authority to monitor or direct the family. It does not erase the case history. Investigation records and any substantiated findings remain in the agency’s files and, where applicable, on the state’s central registry. If a new report comes in later, the prior history will factor into the agency’s risk assessment. Keeping your own documentation of completed services and the closure order is worth the effort for exactly that reason.